Inspiring You To Greatness CDC
Legal name: Inspiring You to Greatness Non Profit Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464952655
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Frisco, TX, USA
- Phone
- (972) 246-8488
- Rating
- 35
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Personal Social Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $231,369
- Expenses
- $363,923
- Assets
- $507,283
- Liabilities
- $220,945
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KACEY SIMMONS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DIANA ROCHIN (COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP): $9,750 total reported compensation
- TESSIE SANTIAGO (VP INVESTOR RELATIONS): $6,600 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A nonprofit 501(c)(3) community development corporation with the mission of providing low-to-moderate income communities with workforce development, technical assistance to small businesses, financial credit literacy education, and neighborhood revitalization through affordable housing in Collin, Dallas, Denton, & Tarrant Counties. Serving Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas.
What it reported doing in 2025
Bootstrap building program bbp: admin: $8,968 real estate related fees: $21,559 venues: $28,780 marketing: $24,946 design: $36,382 conference: $4,605 construction: $35,367 travel: $20,785 accounting: $21,862 meetings: $8,940 interest: $14,111
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - Most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 8
- Transparency & Controls: 56
- Accountability: 65
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 10.2%; rating input score 10
- Program expense ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 6
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 76.9%; rating input score 77; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -57.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -117.5% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -47.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 8 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 10.2% of revenue deployed · 6.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $231K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $10K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 13 of 15 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.