Inspire Charter Schools
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464743375
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Duarte, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6264879943
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,018,441
- Expenses
- $88,098,317
- Assets
- $15,814,456
- Liabilities
- $33,725,016
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
44 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNY THOMPSON (President)
- JODI ERICKSON (President)
- SUZANNE NUNNINK (President)
- ALICE WONG (President)
- JEFF PRAY (President)
- DR HERBERT TAYLOR NICHOLS III (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DR HERBERT TAYLOR NICHOLS III (CEO): $514,197 total reported compensation
- KIMMI BUZZARD (Trustee): $225,583 total reported compensation
- CRISTINO ALCALA (Trustee): $165,799 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide a high standard of education to students through comprehensive curriculum supported by energetic, dynamic, and caring teachers.
What it reported doing in 2016
Provide a virtual curriculum model that emphasizes meeting individual students' needs for meeting the California common core state standards for their grade level.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 6
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.7%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 15.9%; rating input score 16; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.13; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 111.8% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 112% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 101.1% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.7% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 44 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $514K · 44 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2014 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 27 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.