Inspiration Village

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202444450
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Trinity, TX, USA
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Group Homes

Reported finances

Revenue
$-104,069
Expenses
$85,926
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$597,654

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRENDA YOUNG (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID PRICE (SECRETARY TR)
  • CONNIE PRICE (FOUNDER)
  • BRENDA YOUNG (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

In an effort to share their experience with, and compassion for adults and children with disabilitiesthese special people, the origanizers, david and connie price founded inspiration village as a non-profit 501 (c)(3) to provide a loving, nurturing home for mentally-challenged adolescents and adults to create a family environment, in a ranch-style atmosphere. Both day and residential programs are designed to teach each individual to master as many life and job skills as their physical, mental and/or behavioral disabilities will allow.

What it reported doing in 2023

Provide day programs which are designed to teach each individual to master as many life and job skills as their physical, mental and/or behavioral disabilities will allow.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.7%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -182.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $86K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.