Insight Hospital & Medical Center Chicago
Legal name: Insight Chicago Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862358048
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, United States
- Phone
- (312) 567-2000
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $150,594,091
- Expenses
- $179,449,725
- Assets
- $104,833,243
- Liabilities
- $158,090,144
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Atif Bawahab (President and CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Bobby Diniotis (Physician): $866,672 total reported compensation
- Sarabjeet Singh (Physician): $826,491 total reported compensation
- Atya Alfllouse (Physician): $791,916 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At Insight, we are dedicated to transformation and impact. We will deliver world class, compassionate, expert care to every patient who comes through our doors. As stewards of holistic health, Insight is committed to seeing our community flourish through increased access to holistic care and improved health.
What it reported doing in 2024
Insight Chicago Inc. is a licensed 412-bed acute care facility with its primary market in the south and southwest side of Chicago and adjacent suburbs.Insight is committed to rebuilding a storied hospital and looks forward to providing the highest quality of care to our patients. Insight is committed to operating a full-service community hospital; creating a comprehensive plan to increase services and meet community needs; restoring the hospital as a teaching facility and restoring a comprehensive emergency department.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.7%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 60.2%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: $142.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 73.7%; rating input score 74; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.51; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 35.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 31.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 71.7% of revenue deployed · 60.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 19 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported · 0 of 6 affiliation controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $867K · 26 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $20.8M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.