Inside Out Community Development Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
450713446
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Muncie, IN, USA
Phone
7652843423
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Business and Industry

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,809
Expenses
$598,694
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BALL ROBERT A (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • PAUL STEVE (PRESIDENT)
  • TSCHUOR MIKE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BALL ROBERT A (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • PAUL STEVE (PRESIDENT)
  • TSCHUOR MIKE (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Empowering our community through food based initiatives.

What it reported doing in 2024

Fresh directions - the hot meals program, known as "fresh directions hot meals for kids" serve children across the community who are food insecure. The organization collaborates with key community organizations to serve at-risk children and support their efforts to help students reach developmental goals. Partnering with community centers, the organization was able to serve 29,092 hot meals and wholesome snacks to children. Since hot meals were provided to children by fresh directions, community partners were able to focus on their own empowerment activities for the children in their programs. Empowerment also occurred for the children who were served, because when a child is well fed, they are better able to succeed in school and other activities. The impact of the program is further emphasized by the adult and youth volunteers from across the community who give their talents and time to the hot meals program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 2
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -21,213.4%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.