Inova

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
540620889
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Fairfax, VA, USA
Phone
5714728123
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,423,097,177
Expenses
$6,013,870,130
Assets
$8,082,113,289
Liabilities
$3,445,701,440

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • J STEPHEN JONES MD (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • JOHN MOYNIHAN (PRESIDENT SURGICAL SERVICE)
  • ANUJ NARANG (PRESIDENT IFMC & PEDS SERVICES)
  • HARVEY MCDUFFIE (SVP PRESIDENT INOVA REALTY)
  • SUSAN CARROLL (PRESIDENT ILH)
  • JAMES ECKLUND (PRESIDENT NEUROSCIENCES)

Highest reported compensation

  • J STEPHEN JONES MD (PRESIDENT/CEO): $6,579,451 total reported compensation
  • JAMES ECKLUND (PRESIDENT NEUROSCIENCES): $2,447,719 total reported compensation
  • JOHN HAMILTON (PHYSICIAN): $2,306,425 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

With expertise and compassion, Inova partners with patients to help them stay healthy. Our innovative cancer center and compassionate team of experts are devoted to the well-being of our patients and their loved ones in the Washington, DC, metro area and beyond. Inova Schar Cancer is designed to bring healing and hope to every patient with unmatched logistical, clinical and emotional support. Our team of nationally renowned doctors, specialists, surgeons, genetic counselors, nurses and caregivers is empowered by the latest in drug discovery, clinical trials, research and advanced treatments. Programs and services At Inova Schar Cancer, our comprehensive care programs each feature a care team of experts that work together to provide you with a personalized and coordinated care.

What it reported doing in 2024

Inova Health Care Services (IHCS) is part of the Inova Health System whose mission is to serve the needs of the community by establishing, maintaining, and operating hospital facilities, programs, and other shared service arrangements; carrying on health-related education activities; promoting and conducting scientific research; and engaging in activities designed to promote the general health of the community. In 2024, three of Inova Health System's hospitals have been rated with 5 out of 5 stars in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Five-Star Quality Rating System report. A CMS five-star quality rating is based on extensive data that measures patient experience, infection rates, readmissions and mortality.IHCS includes a centralized System Office and the various unincorporated and incorporated subsidiaries. The unincorporated subsidiaries of IHCS include: Inova Fairfax Hospital, Inova Mount Vernon Hospital, Inova Fair Oaks Hospital, Inova Alexandria Hospital, Inova Loudoun Hospital, ACCESS of Reston, ACCESS of Fairfax, Inova Research Center, Assisted Living Facilities, Inova Physical Rehabilitation Services, Inova Urgent Care Centers, Inova Employee Assistance, and Behavioral Health and Addiction Treatment.PROGRAM SERVICESAcute care services are provided on three campuses in Fairfax County, one campus in Loudoun County, and one campus in the City of Alexandria in Virginia. Services provided include emergency and trauma facilities, inpatient and outpatient services, and a variety of ancillary and specialized services. During 2024, IHCS admissions and observations cases totaled 91,584, outpatient visits totaled 769,615 , emergency visits totaled 376,569 (29,649 of the total ER visits were at the Springfield Healthplex, 23,064 at the Lorton Healthplex, and 16,858 at the Ashburn Healthplex) and deliveries totaled 16,301. The acute care program services provided by these hospitals are described more fully below. Inova Fairfax Hospital (IFH) includes the Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Women's Hospital, Inova Fairfax Hospital for Children, and the Inova Schar Cancer Institute. The hospital, located in Central Fairfax County is a 928-licensed bed tertiary care hospital providing comprehensive medical and surgical services which include emergency/trauma, cardiac, transplant, cancer, obstetric, pediatric, neonatal, stroke, and extensive outpatient services. Inova Fairfax Hospital is the home of Northern Virginia's only Level 1 emergency and trauma center and the state-of-the-art Women's and Children's Center. In addition, Inova Fairfax Hospital is a teaching hospital providing clinical training through medical residency, nursing, and paramedical education programs.Inova Mount Vernon Hospital (IMVH) is a 225 licensed bed acute-care hospital serving Southeastern Fairfax County. Inova Mount Vernon Hospital provides a full-service, 24-hour emergency department; broad range of diagnostic, medical, and surgical services; inpatient psychiatric services; the Dorothea R. Fischer Wound Healing Center, and a specialized hyperbaric oxygen therapy program used to treat conditions requiring increased oxygen flow to body tissues (such as grafts and certain types of burns). Inova Mount Vernon Hospital also operates the Lorton Healthplex, a 24-hour free standing emergency facility and the Inova Center for Rehabilitation, a nationally-known accredited program providing inpatient and outpatient rehabilitative services.Inova Fair Oaks Hospital (IFOH) is a top-ranked 174-bed acute care community hospital serving the rapidly growing suburbs of Northern Virginia. Signature service lines include spine, weight loss, joint replacement, and minimally invasive surgery. State-of-the-art cancer care and maternity services are also signature offerings. Inova Fair Oaks Hospital is a fully accredited Comprehensive Center for Bariatric Surgery. Inova Alexandria Hospital (IAH) is a 302-licensed bed general acute care hospital, which opened on Jan

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.9%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.6%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 79.9% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $5.1B in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $6.6M · 20 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $240.9M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 20 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 22 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.