Innovative Care Solutions Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822880211
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7182081743
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $449,496
- Expenses
- $465,655
- Assets
- $88
- Liabilities
- $190,698
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHAIM POLLAK (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CHAIM POLLAK (CEO): $84,255 total reported compensation
- FLORENCE POLLAK (CFO): $73,125 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization provides various social service programs for the benefit of disabled and special needs individuals as well as helping promote orthodox jewish religious education.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization generates revenue from managing pooled medicaid trusts service programs for the benefit of disabled and special needs individuals in New York. The organization was established to manage pooled medicaid trusts pursuant to ny social services law section 366(2)(b)(iii).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.6%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 72%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 94.6%; rating input score 95; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.6%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2,167.02; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -44.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.6% of revenue deployed · 72% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $335K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.