Inner Vision Institute Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474341307
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Espanola, NM, USA
Phone
5057470741
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,454
Expenses
$14,374
Assets
$100,122
Liabilities
$1,230

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FRANK SNYDER (PRESIDENT)
  • JOURDAN YOUNIS (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARILYN SNYDER (TREASURER)
  • FRANK SNYDER (PRESIDENT)
  • JOURDAN YOUNIS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Foster the preservation of traditional indigenous wisdom, values and healing knowledge to benefit individuals and the community through classes and workshops for self-discovery, personal growth and healing. Gatherings are provided to focus on inner and spritual healing and spiritual unfolding for a more fulfilling life experience.

What it reported doing in 2025

The elders wisdom series kicked off in 2018 where elders from various indigenous cultures share their knowledge of how to live on the earth in a resprectful way so that all people can live in harmony. This program consists of lectures, workshops and opportunities for one on one mentoring in nature. All program services of the inner vision institute has been severely impacted by covid 19 and the organization is working on rebuilding.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.1%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 51.9%; rating input score 52

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -25.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.97; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -26.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.1% of revenue deployed · 51.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.