Inner Focus Church
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943141047
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7028919296
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,832
- Expenses
- $11,793
- Assets
- $14,110
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Reverend Sandra Parness (President)
People named in this filing
- Reverend Sandra Parness (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of this church is to embrace the teaching and healing practices of Jesus which include the laying on of hands, speaking the word from God within, exorcism and spiritual teaching.To assist students to understand and develope their inner sensing abilities and high sense perception for expanded awareness, as well as the building of their Christ Consciousness through Inner Focus (intentional learning). To bring forth clear messages of New Age wisdom through the Center of Devinity within each one.
What it reported doing in 2014
Presentation of a teaching program: Workshops presented to teach self healing and skills in leadership. There are also workshops to develope skills to teach future workshops.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 71% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 45.5%; rating input score 46
- Program expense ratio: 18.7%; rating input score 19
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -144.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -21.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -42% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13.6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 45.5% of revenue deployed · 18.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.