Inner City Youth Tutoring
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202604243
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Saint Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3149600004
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,844
- Expenses
- $48,366
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDRANIQUE ELLIS JOE (PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN WENZEL (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANDRANIQUE ELLIS JOE (PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN WENZEL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- STEVE SIMPSON (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Inner city youth tutoring, inc. (icyt) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing high-quality, individualized academic support to at-risk youth (prek12th grade) whose families face financial barriers to educational services. The organizations purpose is to: -improve academic performance in the subject areas of language arts (reading, writing, spelling and grammar), math, and other subjects as needed -close educational achievement gaps -provide structured, safe, and supportive learning environments and -empower students to reach grade-level proficiency and long-term academic success. Icyt focuses specifically on students from underserved communities impacted by economic hardship, unemployment, and under-resourced schools with limited access to educational resources.
What it reported doing in 2025
A major organizational milestone was securing icyts first corporate sponsor through white castles round-up program which resulted in an increase in donation funding and strengthened support for the organizations 2025 biennial fundraising efforts. By the end of the 20242025 school year icyt students demonstrated the following outcomes: 75 attained maintained or exceeded grade-level proficiency in literacy 75 attained maintained or exceeded grade-level proficiency in mathematics 50 achieved honors or honor roll status including one student who successfully completed being a full-time college-level coursework as a high school junior 50 showed improvement in homework completion and classroom participation as reported by parents and teachers 50 of students met or exceeded their individualized academic goals reinforcing the effectiveness of icyts tailored tutoring model
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.5%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 84% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $51K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 6 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.