Inner City Yakima
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991696102
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Yakima, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5099690570
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Basketball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,796
- Expenses
- $7,796
- Assets
- $1,764
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tommy Lizotte (Club President/Head Coach)
People named in this filing
- Tommy Lizotte (Club President/Head Coach)
- Deyion Lizotte (Club Assistant/Secretary)
- Andrew Frederick (Girl's Basketball Head Coach)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Voluntary AAU basketball club for inner city youth. Teaching the fundamentals of basketball through training programs, practices, league and tournament games with valid AAU annual membership cards through Inland Empire AAU. All funds received are from team fundraisers to pay for league, tournament fees, AAU annual player/coach's memberships, basketball supplies, jerseys and AAU club membership fees.
What it reported doing in 2025
Inner City Yakima basketball club started out with 3 teams, age ranging from 5-11. At the end of February 2026, the club has 8 teams from grades 1 through 7th grade. AAU basketball is year-round so there are always league games and tournaments that all teams participate in. Under AAU, all players and coaches are required to have an AAU membership card as their insurance to practice in local school gyms and play in tournaments around the valley and other cities. The teams fundraise to cover the cost of jerseys and game fees to include basketball equipment, training and registrations. All coaches are either parents of players and volunteering to teach, train and coach at risk youths into developing the skills needed to compete in organized basketball.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 35.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.