Inlandia Institute Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270586882
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Riverside, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9512184464
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Printing, Publishing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $243,371
- Expenses
- $219,655
- Assets
- $169,474
- Liabilities
- $1,970
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MINERVA CANTO (PRESIDENT)
- PATRICIA SMITH-HUNT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CATI PORTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CATI PORTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $66,473 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the inlandia institute is to recognize, support and expand literary activity in all of its forms in the inland empire by publishing books and sponsoring programs that deepen people's awareness, understanding and appreciation of this unique, complex and creatively vibrant region.
What it reported doing in 2024
Three of inlandia's core programs are youth creative literacy and adult creative literacy and literary professional development programs as well as the literary laureate, currently focused on teens. These programs support writers of all levels and ages. This is accomplished through creative writing workshops that range from free to minimal cost. Highlights this year include inlandia's journaling journey from a to zine was a six-week summer camp focused on creativity and nature for primary grades at the ssgt. Salvador j. Lara library, led by young adult leaders from a variety of backgrounds who led the children through a weekly program that combined nature with creative literacy. The weekend writing program for teens at the riverside public library, so you want to be a writer? Brought in diverse guest writers from many genres including journalism to manga to poetry to publishing, so that aspiring young writers could get first-hand professional level experience from writers who look like them. Our teen poet laureate project, in partnership with the riverside county office of education, the city of riverside, and the riverside county library system, spotlights dozens of teen poets who each are honored during an awards ceremony at riverside city hall, with one named that year's teen poet laureate by a panel of esteemed poet jurors. Adult writing workshops included opportunities for marginalized communities, including writing warriors, a memoir writing workshop for seniors, and cartless, for the region's unhoused residents, led by a formerly unhoused individual. Additionally we offered spoken word, flash fiction, and poetry workshops, as well as the bilingual tesoros de cuentos and asl poetry workshops, and does it make cents?, on the business of being a writer. In fy 2024-25, we delivered a total of 152 sessions across 17 workshops and 31 sessions across 14 children and youth creative literacy programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.9%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 64.3%; rating input score 64
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.7%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.9% of revenue deployed · 64.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $141K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $66K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.