Inland Valley Baseball Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203523235
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Upland, CA, USA
Phone
9514817331
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Revenue
$193,681
Expenses
$187,584
Assets
$10,459

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CARLOS REYNOSO (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • CARLOS REYNOSO (President & CEO)
  • SHERRY REYNOSO (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide, enhance and develop the skills of all players and increase their knowledge of the game to help them get to higher levels of baseball (high school varsity, college, professional). Moreover, our greatest goal is to give kids a place to go where they learn teamwork and self discipline. We set high standards academically, so that each student/athlete can become a more productive adult within society.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided, enhanced and developed the skills of all players and increased their knowledge of the game to help them get to higher levels of baseball (high school varsity, college, professional). Gave kids a place to go where they learn teamwork and self discipline. We set high standards academically, so that each student/athlete can become a more productive adult within society.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 80% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 55.7%; rating input score 56

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 45.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 31.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54% of revenue deployed · 55.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $104K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.