Inland Empire Youth Soccer Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272113643
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Spokane, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5094740057
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $118,157
- Expenses
- $130,760
- Assets
- $34,443
- Liabilities
- $46,684
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOE HOLLAND (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOE HOLLAND (PRESIDENT)
- SANDIE RATHBUN (TREASURER)
- SCOTT FRAIZER (DEV AT LARGE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The inland empire youth soccer association (ieysa) exists to enhance the development and enjoyment of the game of soccer for children. We strive to promote soccer as a fun, healthy way to foster physical fitness, good sportsmanship, teamwork, and friendships, through unified leadership, quality player development programs, accessible coaching education and supportive parent resources.
What it reported doing in 2020
Under the insurance of us club soccer, the inland empire youth soccer association (ieysa) is a collaboration of unified clubs, which offers recreational, developmental and competitive soccer to youth. Ieysa works to improve, develop, and perpetuate the best youth soccer experience possible in our area. Ieysa completes this mission by sponsoring four tournaments, with 100 teams and allowing 1,000 children participate in soccer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 67% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46.2%; rating input score 46
- Program expense ratio: 44.4%; rating input score 44
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.36; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 46.2% of revenue deployed · 44.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $58K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.