Inland Empire Community Outreach Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 833268456
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- San Bernardino, CA, USA
- Phone
- +1 877-957-7454
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $320,045
- Expenses
- $76,214
- Assets
- $419,419
- Liabilities
- $52,545
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Donald Love (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Velveth Moreno (Director)
- Donald Love (Executive Director)
- Jordan Love (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to empower and uplift underserved individuals and families by providing essential health and wellness services, housing support, and reentry programs. We are committed to reducing recidivism, improving mental and physical health, and fostering a healthier, more equitable community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided transitional housing and reentry services to justice-involved individuals on probation, including safe housing, meals, peer-support, and life-skills mentoring. In 2024, IECOC housed and supported multiple probation clients at several rental properties, helping participants secure employment and achieve self-sufficiency.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24.4%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 76.2%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.5; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 49.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 11 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 24.4% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $76K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 40 of 42 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule M noncash within contributions did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.