Inland Christian Home

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237304210
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Ontario, CA, USA
Phone
(909) 983-0084
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,387,824
Expenses
$17,411,176
Assets
$31,637,750
Liabilities
$19,558,586

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICK JASPER (Vice President)
  • HELEN WILSON (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID STIENSTRA (Executive Dir.): $175,222 total reported compensation
  • Darryl Whitehead (Chief Operations Officer): $169,621 total reported compensation
  • Natalie Croan (Director of Nursing): $155,083 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Inland Christian Home is a non-profit, faith-based senior living community in Ontario offering independent living, assisted living, adult day care, memory care and skilled nursing in a warm and welcoming atmosphere. Inland Christian Home is a non-profit, faith-based community grounded in Christian values, fostering a welcoming atmosphere and open to people of all backgrounds. Our community offers activities and events to create a meaningful and enriching experience for our residents. This environment provides comfort and a sense of belonging, making it a place where residents can truly feel at home. As one of our team members put it, “We honor and live by our mission statement,” which reflects our founders’ heritage of faith and values: to provide quality, individualized care to seniors in a Christian environment. Our warm and welcoming atmosphere nurtures the physical, emotional and...

What it reported doing in 2025

Health care services for the aged serving 70,347 patient days during the year.retirement care and services for the aged featuring 221 on site units.average daily individuals in assisted living - 26average daily individuals in memory care - 18average daily individuals in cottages - 37average daily individuals in apartments - 57

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.8%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 73.7%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3,235.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.82; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 73.8% of revenue deployed · 73.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $175K · 18 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.