Inked Ministry Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
834247906
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Flowery Branch, GA, USA
Phone
8048328330
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religious Film, Video
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,000
Expenses
$0
Assets
$1,750
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marianne Southerland (President)
  • Blake Southerland (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Marianne Southerland (President)
  • Blake Southerland (Vice President)
  • Tatiana Santana (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Religious exemption. Ministry for the purpose of sharing the love of Jesus and helping lead people to salvation through sharing testimonies. We work a lot with recovery, helping people in their addiction and inspiring them for more. We also provide funding for helping people cover up demonic tattoos.

What it reported doing in 2022

We have reached people in 22 different countries and led 27 people to salvation. We have been able to produce videos and our social media has reached thousands of people. We have been involved in 2 recovery projects locally and provided time volunteering and also mentoring to 10 individuals in recovery. Our ministry has led Bible studies and devotion programs reaching over 1,000 people worldwide.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -177.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 80% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.