Inhealth Wisconsin Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391994113
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2011
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Milwaukee, WI, USA
Phone
2622389455
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Continuing Education

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$75,049
Expenses
$108,925
Assets
$14,495

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Inhealth Wisconsin designs innovative and inspiring health education experiences that harness the power of story and collaboration to improve community health and eliminate disparities.

What it reported doing in 2011

Inhealth Wisconsin continues to create, evolve, and expand partnerships with community organizations to develop and deliver health education programs and training to their communities. In 2011 these activities included delivery of the teen peer mental health program; delivery of and training for a "transitions" program for middle school students including training materials and companion presentations to parents and teachers; work with schools to train teen peer educators; delivery of and train the trainers for an in-service on trauma and mental health in early childhood and early elementary students for teachers, parents, and other caregivers of young children; filming in school classrooms to expand the strategies, case studies, and video to support parents and teachers around socio-emotional (www.teachingminute.com); and work to develop a strategic planning process for a new partnership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 79.1%; rating input score 79

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -45.1%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -43.8% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -105.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 79.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $86K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $32K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.