Ingrid B Lacy Middle School Pto
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421705188
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Pacifica, CA, USA
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $101,668
- Expenses
- $71,100
- Assets
- $84,918
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARIA JACKSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARIA JACKSON (PRESIDENT)
- KAREN STEVENSON (VICE PRESIDE)
- HEIDI PEREIRA (CO-TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the ingrid b lacy parent teacher organization (pto) is to create an active, cohesive community of families, faculty and staff at ingrid b lacy middle school. This community will work to achieve the vision and goals developed for ibl middle school with the support of enrichment and recognition programs. Ibl pto supports the programs of ingrid b lacy middle school, which include: 6th, 7th & 8th grade activities, bold, technology, leadership, library, student clubs, teacher appreciation, student planners, classroom mini grants, field trips and recognitions.
What it reported doing in 2023
Challenge day - our day-long challenge day is an experiential social and emotional learning program that offers students an opportunity to ignite a shift toward greater school connectedness, empathy, and inclusivity.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. No material rating questions were generated from the available inputs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.8%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.1%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.8% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $69K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.