Inglewood PMA Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464848714
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Inglewood, CA, USA
Phone
3104128681
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Government and Public Administration

Reported finances

Revenue
$85,000
Expenses
$89,975
Assets
$61,264

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brett Birkbeck (President)
  • Geoffrey Meeks (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Brett Birkbeck (President)
  • Geoffrey Meeks (Vice President)
  • Neal Cochran (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide services and benefits to the Police Officers' of the City of Inglewood, CA with a rank classification of Deputy Police Chief, Police Captain, Police Lieutenant, and Police Sergeant. Theses service and benefits include legal representation, certain disability benefits, collective bargaining representation, sponsorships, and to provide programs, assistance and education that enables the Association and its Members to better serve the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Program ServicesState organization dues, meeting expenses, negotiation expenses, educational programs, membership recognition, sponsorships, labor relation and retirement awards, community donations and public awareness programs for the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.7%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94.2%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.7% of revenue deployed · 94.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $85K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.