Ingenium Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264726775
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Great Falls, MT, USA
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,848
- Expenses
- $59,955
- Assets
- $10,994
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Josh Hughes (President)
- Trevor Huges (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Josh Hughes (President)
- Cyndi Hughes (Operations Manager)
- Trevor Huges (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ingeniums purpose is to connect to youth though their pre-existing passion in video games and use that passion to help them explore STEAM Science Technology Engineering Art and Math Cultures Computer Science and Community Impact.
What it reported doing in 2023
Supaman is a Montana based rapper who has some of his music in our games and will also play a character in one of our games. We work with him to teach kids about Native culture which he does with and without us and how to engage different cultures in your art in ways that have dignity and respect and dont engage in cultural appropriation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 98%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.4%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 75.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -45.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -90.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83% of revenue deployed · 98% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.