Inge Benevolent Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474564308
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4104668686
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religion Related N.E.C.
Affiliation
Religious (unspecified)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$490,000
Expenses
$420,000
Assets
$97,500
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ammar Hanif (CEO, Vice-President. [until 2/1/2019])
  • Asma Hanif (President)
  • Ayyub Hanif (CEO/Vice President [began 2/1/2019])

Highest reported compensation

  • Aliyah Wilson (Program Director): $36,538 total reported compensation
  • Ammar Hanif (CEO, Vice-President. [until 2/1/2019]): $20,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To engage in benevolent, scientific, educational, moral and spiritually motivated social interaction among our community and members in order to improve the conditions of humanity. We provide shelter and homeless services, domestic violence education, advocacy, and health services for those in need. We work to promote DEI Initiatives, strengthen the quality of and access to STEM Education, and environmental stewardship.

What it reported doing in 2019

Issue Awareness and Education. Provides direct and indirect education/awareness on pertinent topics. Domestic Violence Education provided to approximately 5000 persons, presented at approximately 5 events. Mental Health Education provided to approximately 2200 persons. Healthcare Literacy provided to approximately 4500 persons.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 57
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.1%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 64.3%; rating input score 64
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.6%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 31% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.1% of revenue deployed · 64.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $270K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $37K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.