Information Technology-information Sharing and Analysis Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
522292219
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Manassas, VA, USA
Phone
7033854969
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,707,875
Expenses
$1,730,707
Assets
$2,715,449
Liabilities
$674,257

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

38 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY ANN DAVIDSON (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • WILLIAM GENZA (PRESIDENT)
  • SCOTT C ALGEIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ANTHONY SOUZA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARY ANN DAVIDSON (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • WILLIAM GENZA (PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE STELLMACHER (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Information technology infrastructure

What it reported doing in 2024

A) data collection and analysis-compile information from members, non-members and government agencies on electronic incidents, threats, attacks, vulnerabilities, solutions and countermeasures. Supplement such information with other information as may be proper for accuracy and completenss. Synthesize industrys response to such threat. Produce global internet threat trends and analysis. B) data sharing and dissemination-provide a dedicated network alerting members and others to new and emerging threats, risks and other vulnerabilities. Provide a dedicated forum for members and others to share information about best security practices, security breaches and their remediation, and other information relevant to information technology security. C) meetings-hold one annual meeting of members, as well as special meetings as needed, as may be appropriate to further the purpose of the organization.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.1%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 47.9%; rating input score 48
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 97.4%; rating input score 97; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.57; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.1% of revenue deployed · 47.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 38 of 39 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $829K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 38 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.3M reported
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.