Infinite Legacy

Legal name: Infinite Legacy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521736533
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Baltimore, MD, US
Phone
410-242-7000
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Organ and Tissue Banks

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$64,038,583
Expenses
$67,723,632
Assets
$78,763,098
Liabilities
$14,610,643

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHARLES ALEXANDER (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHARLES ALEXANDER (PRESIDENT & CEO): $735,866 total reported compensation
  • DEBBIE WILLIAMS (EXECUTIVE VP & COO): $410,931 total reported compensation
  • DEBORAH MCRANN (VP AND CHIEF CLINICAL OFFICER): $387,911 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We inspire our communities to create an infinite legacy through organ, eye and tissue donation.

What it reported doing in 2025

Outreach and hospital services: the hospital services department functions as the advisors to the hospital staff with which infinite legacy partners. They work collaboratively with the hospitals to identify and implement solutions for best practices in the industry. The community outreach department is responsible for educating residents about organ, eye and tissue donation; and empowering the public to designate themselves as donors through education and outreach services. This includes informing people about the donation process, dispelling myths and misconceptions, and sharing the stories of those who received a second chance at life. They also facilitate awareness events, community partnerships, presentations, grassroots organizing, marketing communications campaigns, and more.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.9%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 75.3%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 79.1%; rating input score 79; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 80.9% of revenue deployed · 75.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $51M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $736K · 28 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.7M reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.