Infinite Chance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824230353
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Lebanon, OH, USA
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$105,314
Expenses
$94,885
Assets
$142,898

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Danielle Weaver (President)
  • Aaron Mott (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Danielle Weaver (President)
  • Aaron Mott (Vice President)
  • Taryn Walsh (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide educational opportunities and long-term support to vulnerable children in Guatemala helping them build brighter futures through access to schooling skill development and community-based care.

What it reported doing in 2025

Infinite Chance facilitated the transfer of donor-restricted funds to Hogar Miguel Magone a childrens home in Guatemala. These funds supported the education housing nutrition and overall care of approximately 150 children and young adults. While Infinite Chance does not directly administer services at the home it serves as a conduit for U.S.-based supporters who contribute to the well-being and development of the children through designated funding.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 88% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.9%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $82K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.