Indorican Multicultural Dance Project Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270859186
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6465411561
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,401
- Expenses
- $1,633
- Assets
- $10,806
- Liabilities
- $2,091
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TERESA CUEVAS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TERESA CUEVAS (PRESIDENT)
- HAROLD EVERTON (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dedicated nbsp; to nbsp; celebrate nbsp; the nbsp; cultureal nbsp; diversity nbsp; of nbsp; ne nbsp; york nbsp; city nbsp; and nbsp; its nbsp; inhabitants nbsp; and nbsp; in nbsp; so nbsp; we nbsp; encourage nbsp; people nbsp; to nbsp; take nbsp; a nbsp; stand nbsp; on nbsp; event nbsp; happenigs nbsp; around nbsp; them nbsp; we nbsp; believe nbsp; that nbsp; education nbsp; truly nbsp; is nbsp; the nbsp; key nbsp; to nbsp; the nbsp; world
What it reported doing in 2025
To celebrate the cultural diversity of New York city and its inhabitants and in doing so to encourage people to take a stand on events happening around them. We beleive education is truly the key for worldly accord and we aim to educate all children.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.2%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 43.1%; rating input score 43
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.6%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.62; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 39.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -33.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.2% of revenue deployed · 43.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.