Indo American Cultural and Religious Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860620445
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6239309657
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cultural, Ethnic Awareness
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,322,592
- Expenses
- $951,415
- Assets
- $5,837,030
- Liabilities
- $1,182,152
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
38 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Syam S Byra (President)
- Minaxi Dhirendra Patel (Vice President)
- Manherlal Khatri (Vice President)
- Rajesh Pawanikar (Vice President)
- Sita Raman ex-Officio (Past President)
People named in this filing
- Vikram Shah (Chairperson)
- Suru Patel (Vice Chairperso)
- Prakash Deshmukh (Vice Chairperso)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a fellowship hall for members and guests and rental facility for associated groups and a location to hold religious and cultural meetings and gatherings.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provides a facility for groups to hold religious and social events to further their causes
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.8%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 54.1%; rating input score 54
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.14; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.8% of revenue deployed · 54.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 792 of 792 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $515K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 38 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.