Individual Advocacy Group Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364057568
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Romeoville, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6307590201
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Civil Rights, Social Action, Advocacy N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,880,946
- Expenses
- $61,994,688
- Assets
- $40,738,188
- Liabilities
- $7,514,966
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR CHARLENE BENNETT (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DR CHARLENE BENNETT (PRESIDENT): $276,167 total reported compensation
- SAGKILA PUCKETT (DFO): $225,024 total reported compensation
- CASEY NELSON (REGIONAL ADMIN): $186,767 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Iag's mission is to aid & provide customized services to both children and adults with disabilities, and their families, to live normal lives in the community, to remain in a community home, live independently and actively participate in community life.
What it reported doing in 2024
All other accomplishmentsthe day program and the subcontract day program are developmental training programs that help people with developmental and other disabilities acquire interpersonal skills for participating in the community through work training and community activity programs. The day program also provide services to most of our 224 cila individuals. The intermediate care facility for the individual with an intellectual disability (icfiid) developmental training (dt) program is part of the 24-hour medicaid entitlement program for children and adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities who meet eligibility requirements. The dt program is a subcontract with an icfiid with a licensed dt provider for five days per week over 12 months providing 240 days of service to individuals who reside at the icfiid. Iag provides dt services for more than 153 people from 5 icfiid. The program provides training and supports ranging from self care and professional hygiene training to community activities and internet learning program based on individual needs and interests.the dhs traumatic brain injury (tbi) waiver program provides a stay at home option to nursing home placement for children and adults who have sustained a tbi. Individuals with a tbi may elect to stay at home and use case coordinators to identify and locate necessary supports ranging from a personal assistant to visiting nurse to home modification for accessibility. Iag provides ongoing case coordination for people who have successfully remained at home rather than placement in a nursing home.in the host family program, a family accepts one or two adult individuals with an intellectual or developmental disability into their home as family members. The host family contracts with iag for payment of its support and services.dhs therapy and behavioral services are provided by licensed professionals who are certified (npi) medicaid providers. Therapists provide interventions for individuals or groups with issues ranging from severe mental illness or post trauma disorders to interpersonal relationships. Behavioral, services are provided by ph, d./psy, p. Licensed psychologists or certified behavior analysts for individuals with severe and persistent behavioral disorders. 153 people in iag's cila program received therapy and/or support each year.home based services program is part of the waiver program for children and adults with an intellectual disability/developmental disability. Iag supports individuals and their families to continue home based living, by assisting them in acquiring needed personal equipment such as an e.g. And a wheelchair.short term stabilization homes program (ssh) funded by Illinois department of human services (idhs), division of developmental disabilities, the ssh program will provide, upon referral from the division of developmental disabilities (ddd), short term stabilization residential services for up to 90 days to adults with an intellectual or developmental disability who are experiencing active behavioral conditions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.9% of revenue deployed · 89.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $55.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $276K · 15 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $537K reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.