Indianapolis Senior Citizens Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351071436
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2009
- Forms available
- Form 990 2009
- Location
- Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Phone
- 3172636272
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Senior Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,251,745
- Expenses
- $1,442,860
- Assets
- $4,683,894
- Liabilities
- $1,428,076
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The center's mission is to enhance the lives and support the independence of older adults by providing social and recreational activities, education, access to information and opportunities for healthy lifestyles.
What it reported doing in 2009
Information and referral services, health appointments and counseling services, legal, tax insurance services and assistance; health screenings, fitness training and information. These programs provide individuals with the knowledge and means to enable them to overcome barriers to a healthy lifestyle.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.3%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.25; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $69K · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.