Indiana Senthang Baptist Church

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
823155735
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2020
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Greenwood, IN, United States
Phone
(317) 487-9907
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$248,142
Expenses
$161,677
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PETER LENG UK (PRESIDENT)
  • STEPHEN SANGCEM SAKHONG (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PETER LENG UK (PRESIDENT)
  • BIAK CUNG NUNG (SECRETARY)
  • CUNG THANG (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

TLAIHTENG LE POMNING 1. Hi Khrihfabu chungah nawingeihnak sangbik cu Bible Cathiang lamhruainak a si lai. 2. Zumhnak thawngin thiamcoter kan si caah Jesuh Khrih thawngin Pathian he kan i rem (Rom.5:1). 3. Bible Cathiang cu Pathian thawchuahhnawhmi a si (2Tim. 3:16). 4. Pa, Fapa le Thiang Thlarau cu Pathian pakhat a si i, thumkop Pathian min in tipil innak kan zumh (Matt.28:19-20). … TINHMI 1. Member dihlak nih taksa, thinlung le thlarau ah damnak an hmuh khawhnak dingah dirhmi Khrihfabu a si lai. Pathian thawngtha bia karhtertu le Pathian pen-ram kauhtertu Khrihfabu a si lai. A lamkip in thanchonak dingah a zuam pengmi Khrihfabu a si lai.

What it reported doing in 2020

Sunday church worship program and services sunday school programs

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Multi-channel. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 43% for direct work, 17% for grants, and 40% for member benefits.

The verdict

MIXED - The strongest available result is that a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 57
  • Accountability: 36
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.3%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: Limited
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 34.8%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 55.3% of revenue deployed · 84.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.