Indiana Psychological Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 356042450
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Fishers, IN, USA
- Phone
- 3172577449
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $164,188
- Expenses
- $156,246
- Assets
- $215,291
- Liabilities
- $58,238
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DICK RHOAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SHANNON WOLLER (PRESIDENT)
- GILI GOLDFRAD (PAST PRESIDENT)
- EMILY ROTH (PRESIDENT ELECT)
People named in this filing
- DICK RHOAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SHANNON WOLLER (PRESIDENT)
- GILI GOLDFRAD (PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance psychology as a science, as a profession, and as a means of promoting public welfare. Ipa supports and promotes high standards for psychological service, training and research; facilitates the study of psychology at all levels; promotes high standards of professional ethics; provides opportunities for the professional development of psychologists; and encourages programs or projects that benefit the public.
What it reported doing in 2025
Conferences for psychologists, members and students for psychology. Providing over 2,000 hours of continuing education for psychologists, other mental health providers, and students through conferences, home study, and seminars reaching over 500 professionals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.