Indiana Minority Health Coalition Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
351924268
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3179264011
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,352,197
Expenses
$7,377,295
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CARL ELLISON (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • WESLEY LANCASTER (CFO): $82,717 total reported compensation
  • NANCY JEWELL (SENIOR ALALYST): $80,125 total reported compensation
  • CARL ELLISON (CEO): $75,955 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Imhc exist to eliminate

What it reported doing in 2016

Imhc contracted with corizon health to carry out prison health services including providing psychiatrists to deliver mental health services within the state's prisons, and case managers to facilitate, so as to reduce recidivism, the connection of paroled prisoners to community health, social and employment resources. Campaign" outperformed the other 25 states in its category to win a national enrollment contest by enrolling 4,206 new users into text4baby. Imhc was recognized for this achievement

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 68
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 93.3%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -30.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 93.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $83K · 7 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2012 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.