Indiana Latino Institute Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260036285
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3174721055
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cultural, Ethnic Awareness

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,478,705
Expenses
$2,187,743
Assets
$3,705,887
Liabilities
$362,336

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marlene Dotson (President & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Marlene Dotson (President & CEO): $195,490 total reported compensation
  • Andrew Penalva (Director of Workforce Development): $93,156 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to advance Latino educational attainment and workforce preparedness statewide through advocacy, leadership development, and culturally responsive programming.

What it reported doing in 2024

EDUCATIONThe Indiana Latino Institute focuses on increasing the number of Latino high school and college graduates in Indiana by preparing them in four key areas: college access, college success, workforce preparedness, and Voice/Youth Empowerment.a. College AccessILI helps students navigate college processes, financial aid, and career exploration. ILI also refers students and their families to general social service agencies for additional needs. ILI presents information to students and parents about higher education topics such as college readiness, scholarships, financial aid, workforce development, and community service. ILI host annual education summits to educate students on how to successfully prepare for, and complete, the college access component of the college process. A College and Career fair is provided for students.b. College SuccessThe Indiana Latino Institute supports college students statewide throughout their years in higher education to graduation and into the workforce. From one-on-one college coaching, internships, and scholarships, ILI provides resources to ensure students are informed and prepared as they continue their education.There are opportunities for college students at all levels, from traditional four-year tracks, part-time students, certificate programs, and more.c. Workforce PreparednessFirst Year Employment Exploration - ILI secures community partners to host incoming college freshmen over the summer. The program includes real world experience as well as resume development guidance and professional development trainings from ILI staff.Internship Program - ILI secures community partners to host interns over the summer. The internship includes real world experience as well as assistance from ILI staff who guide students to develop their resume and conduct career research projects. ILI provides interns with a scholarship upon completion of the internship.Internship through Partnership ILI partnerships with existing internship programs are available through partners such as Eli Lilly, Sherwin Williams, Allison Transmission, Carrier UTC, and Indiana Internet. These entities are established to provide workforce development opportunities for students. The Indiana Latino Institute places students in these programs that are run by outside entities.Fellowship Program - ILI secures corporate partners to host fellows who are college seniors or graduate students. The fellowship includes real world experience as well as character and leadership development trainings. Fellows are paid directly for their time.d. VOICE (Youth Health Empowerment)The program seeks to engage, educate, and empower youth to celebrate a tobacco-free lifestyle. Voice is actively building a network of Latino youth leaders to assist with the design and implementation of initiatives that will educate the community and empower their peers to be tobacco-free and have a healthy lifestyle."

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91.1%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $22.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -47.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.2%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $195K · 21 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.