Indiana Dental Hygienists Association Inc Group Return

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
351819128
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
2197982340
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,094
Expenses
$9,969
Assets
$47,625
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CENTRAL-SHARON FENTON (TRUSTEE)
  • CENTRAL-PAM RETTIG (TRUSTEE)
  • OHIO VALLEY-KATELYN MAHONEY (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support the american dental hygienists' association with its mission to improve the public's health by advancing the art and science of dental hygiene, ensuring access to quality oral health care, increasing awareness of the cost-effective benefits of prevention, promoting the highest standards of dental hygiene education, licensure, practice and research, and representing and promoting the interests of dental hygienists. Specific goals of the Indiana dental hygienists association are also to achieve self-regulation of dental hygiene education, licensure and practice in Indiana, to promote consumer advocacy in oral health care as a part of total health and to serve as the authoritative resource for the profession of dental hygiene.

What it reported doing in 2018

The biggest program for the local components will be their ability to conduct continuing education courses in the component areas. With last year's structural changes within idha, demographics have changed for each component and they have many new members to whom the component needs to reach. Anticipated participation from members is approximately 10-20 members, depending on component size. Membership recruitment is vital to our organization and addressed at these component meetings by including non-members. Component leadership meet in the summer to prepare their meeting schedule. Not all meetings include a continuing education opportunity, but many do. Non-members are invited to attend these meetings with continuning education opportunities but pay a small fee for ce certification.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.7%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.3%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.78; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.