Indiana Coalition to End Sexual Assault Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475205431
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3176242370
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Sexual Abuse, Prevention

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$996,329
Expenses
$991,547
Assets
$541,502
Liabilities
$54,462

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETH WHITE (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • PRISCILLA KEITH (BOARD PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ELIZABETH WHITE (PRESIDENT & CEO): $150,396 total reported compensation
  • JAMES MICHAEL WEISEMAN (COO): $119,306 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Icesaht empowers Indiana communities to prevent sexual assault and human trafficking and serve those impacted by it through comprehensive training, advocacy, increased public awareness and coordinated sexual assault services.the Indiana coalition to end sexual assault and human trafficking:-provides communication and a supportive network to sexual assault and human trafficking survivors, service providers, and supporters throughout Indiana.-promotes the expansion of sexual assault and human trafficking services.-assists in building the capacity of community organizations and other allies to support survivors.-offers comprehensive training that is evidence-based, victim centered, and culturally competent to service providers and community-based organizations.-provides in-depth curriculum and raises community awareness on the root causes of sexual violence and human trafficking and how to prevent both.-addresses public policy affecting survivors and service providers.

What it reported doing in 2025

Sexual assault response coordination - the foundation of icesa's work is to ensure victims of sexual violence and human trafficking have access to services. Icesa continues to advocate for an increase of rape crisis centers and sexual assault response teams (sarts). Rape crisis centers help survivors feel safe and empowered. Trained victim advocates help survivors provide compassionate support at any point during a survivor's healing journey. Services include: 24-hour crisis line, hospital/medical advocacy, criminal justice advocacy, professional counseling/therapy and support groups. Sexual assault response teams (sarts) play a powerful role in improving the collective response to sexual violence by increasing access to justice and healing. Sarts improve access to services by addressing barriers, service delivery, increasing offender accountability, and working with victims with trauma informed, victim centered and culturally competent best practices.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 96% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.1%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: $87.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 27.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.1% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $937K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 14 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.