Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311009769
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3179173685
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,242,889
Expenses
$2,974,744
Assets
$2,626,291
Liabilities
$226,858

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA BERRY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • LAURA BERRY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $156,847 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Icadv works for the prevention and elimination of domestic violence - until the violence ends. Icadv works to eliminate domestic violence through the implementation of prevention programs and public awareness in communities and schools, through advocacy for system change, and through the influencing of public policy and allocation of resources.

What it reported doing in 2024

Prevention, services and awareness: icadv continued to advance its mission through the development of innovative programming, comprehensive training, and technical assistance to the domestic violence and prevention community. Efforts included expanding mobile advocacy across Indiana, developing a regional service model to ensure access to services for all survivors, engaging survivors to ensure programs align with their identified needs, and developing tool kits and resources to support advocates in the field. Icadv collaborated with community partners to elevate protective strategies for preventing violence and disseminated educational information to the public through newsletters, websites, social media, events, awareness campaigns, brochures, and podcasts. Recognizing that economic stability is essential both to preventing domestic violence and to restoring safety for survivors, icadv engaged policymakers and private sector leaders to promote evidence-based economic support policies such as paid family leave, living wages, and a robust social safety net. In partnership with the state of Indiana, icadv evaluated the state's paid parental leave benefit, published findings, and encouraged additional employers to adopt similar policies. The coalition also worked closely with lawmakers to secure critical funding to sustain programs and services for the next two years.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 78% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 80% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.7%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $44.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.7% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $157K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.