Indiana Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351364420
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Phone
- 3174411088
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $761,290
- Expenses
- $750,805
- Assets
- $491,590
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EVAN KREUTZER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRIS WEINTRAUT (EXECUTIVE DI): $117,729 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Indiana chapter of the american academy of pediatrics is committed to the attainment of optimal physical, mental, and social health for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults.
What it reported doing in 2024
Advocacy in 2024 inaap continued its role as a leading advocate for children's health in Indiana. During the state's 2024 legislative session inaap testified on nearly a dozen different bills, both in-person and through written testimony. Critically, many of the bills on which inaap provided its expertise were related to efforts that would have had a disproportionately negative impact of populations that have been historically marginalized. Education was the prominent topic during the 2024 session, and there were several ideas put forward that were of concern to pediatricians. Through its involvement with the Indiana coalition for youth justice, inaap was able to provide the medical perspective on issues like chronic absenteeism, the negative effects of efforts to hold more kids back a grade, and increasing restrictions on access to school-based mental health services. Two examples of inaap's written testimony are being provided as pdfs. Though Indiana did pass a bill requiring children to be held back if they did meet the third grade reading level requirement, inaap's testimony helped ensure that those kids received access to summer school and other resources to actually address their reading skill deficiencies. In 2024 inaap also recognized the perilous state of medicaid funding early in the year, and called together a coalition in the summer of 2024 to preemptively engage lawmakers on the importance of protecting kids' access to coverage. Acting in the leading role, inaap brought together the Indiana's leading medical organizations to sound the alarm - a letter from that effort is provided. Programs inaap is incredibly proud of both the reach and impact its programs had on Indiana's children and their families in 2024. Inaap currently supports three major initiatives - reach out and read, Indiana's cease tobacco cessation program, and the care mental health referral program. Collectively, these programs served 209,578 children and their families over the course of 2024. Though all of the programs are meaningful, inaap is especially proud of the work that its care program did in 2024. Care is a unique and vital initiative that inaap created to help address Indiana's growing pediatric mental health crisis. By connecting children and families with mental health providers, the program removes barriers to care and ensures that families receive the support they need. Unlike general referral services, the care line uses full-time family navigators to provide a hands-on intake and referral process - helping families find providers, navigate insurance complexities, and follow up to ensure services are successfully established. Further, the program follows up with primary care providers which fosters collaboration between medical and mental health professionals and improves care coordination. Care began serving its first families in 2023, but expanded rapidly in 2024 by adding two additional full-time navigators. The program has now served families in 70 of Indiana's 92 counties. In 2024 the program helped 534 new children and adolescents access crucial mental health services, including those in underserved early childhood populations. A pdf which more fully explains the care program is included with this application. Recruitment and retention inaap's strategy for membership recruitment and retention was a direct result of priorities identified as part of its 2024 board of directors retreat and the strategic planned that was formulated as part of that meeting. Broadly, the board recognized a need to offer strong member value that offered a variety of ways to engage with the chapter and was also responsive to the things that members identified as most valuable to them. To be as responsive as possible, inaap conducted a chapter-wide member survey in 2024 which established that state level advocacy and communication of emerging pediatric updates were top priorities. This information allowed the chapter to implement new services and host
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.4%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 99.7%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.4% of revenue deployed · 99.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $749K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $118K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.