Indian Muslim Relief and Charities

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270058132
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Mountain View, CA, USA
Phone
6508560440
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Islam

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,004,213
Expenses
$7,339,407
Assets
$56,144,008
Liabilities
$68,068

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Javed Sikander (Vice President)
  • Maqsood Quadri (President)
  • Nusrat Deen (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Manzoor Ghori (Trustee): $151,625 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Help India's muslims and minorities achieve security, freedom, equality and their rights as citizens of India

What it reported doing in 2024

Program - India health initiative: Medical professionals from the US team up with physicians in India to provide health care in rural areas. Patients who may have never seen a doctor or cannot afford treatment get a chance to be seen and receive medicine, minor procedures, and more.4,030 Patients were served during India Health Initiative Project.A total of 118,908 Patients were treated/seen through our Healthcare Programs.PROGRAM: INDO-US HOSPITALThe Indo-US Hospital multi-specialty hospital and diabetes research center was built to provide affordable and quality health care for the poor. We provide dialysis, eyeSurgeries and regular checkups at a free or low subsidized cost. We now have a department of cardiology, ICU, gastroenterology, laparoscopic surgery, neurology, neurosurgery, and obstetrics.In 2024, the Indo-US Hospital 10,000 Dialysis sessions performed.More than 750 eye surgeries performed out of which 450 Free Eye surgeries performed104,207 Patients were treated through our Healthcare program.Opened our 2nd Indo-US Hospital site in Toli Chowki.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 90% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 51
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.7%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 88.9%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $66.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Pass
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.6%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.65; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.7% of revenue deployed · 88.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 9 filed program accomplishments · $6.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $152K · 15 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.