Indian Association of Greater Somerset County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453359603
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Warren, NJ, USA
Phone
9083917746
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Cultural, Ethnic Awareness

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20
Expenses
$1,406
Assets
$38,928

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MEENA ARVIND (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KIRAN KOTHARI (TRUSTEE)
  • SUBHASH SHAH (TRUSTEE)
  • MEENA ARVIND (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

.to cultivate, promote, foster, sponsor, and develop asian indian community in somerset county and neighboring areas in the state of New Jersey. 2.to educate children about indian culture, values, and customs. 3.to educate the mainstream community about asian indian culture, values and customs, with an aim to increase understanding and importance of diversity. 4.to organize and sponsor lectures, seminars, meetings, exhibitions, radio and television programs to promote asian indian arts, music, languages, and literature. 5.to develop and undertake educational programs leading to a balanced growth in the physical, social and psychological development of members. 6.to collect and administer funds for cultural, scientific, educational and charitable purposes within the meaning of section 501(c) (3) of the internal revenue code of 1954, specifically to improve the quality of human life all over the world

What it reported doing in 2024

No major events in 2024.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6,930%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 27.69; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -27.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -28.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.