India Association of New Hampshire

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
223028195
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Manchester, NH, USA
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$40,506
Expenses
$22,003
Assets
$141,036

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mr Balaji Radhakrishnan (President)

People named in this filing

  • Mr Balaji Radhakrishnan (President)
  • Mr Manoj Chourasia (VicePresident)
  • Dr Tej Dhakar (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

India Association of New Hampshire is is a tax-exempt organization under Tax Exempt Code 501c3. Donations Contributions to IANH are tax deductible to the full extent as provided by the law. Please consult your tax-advisor for more details. PURPOSE 1. TO FOSTER THE GENERAL WELL BEING OF THE ASIAN INDIAN COMMUNITY. 2. TO ORGANIZE AND PRESENT CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS. 3. TO PROMOTE COMMUNITY AND CHARITABLE SERVICES. 4. TO PROMOTE POLITICAL AWARENESS IN THE ASIAN INDIAN COMMUNITY. 5. TO PROMOTE GOODWILL BETWEEN INDIA AND THE U.S.A.

What it reported doing in 2025

Cultural Events includesFestival of Lights in November and Spring Festival i n May to Promote the Culture of India and provide opportunities for community to participate in Cultural events. 13131 was used for the 2 events conducted which included facility fees and other expenses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 60% for direct work, and 40% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.7%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.41; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 52.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 31.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.