Independent Sector

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521081024
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2024676100
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,075,060
Expenses
$11,026,617
Assets
$22,152,555
Liabilities
$7,645,781

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AKILAH WATKINS (PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • AKILAH WATKINS (PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $769,294 total reported compensation
  • RICK ROBINSON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $416,788 total reported compensation
  • JEFF MOORE (CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER): $353,803 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We unite nonprofits and philanthropy to strengthen the charitable sector, identifying structural challenges and mobilizing the sector around policy and practice solutions.

What it reported doing in 2025

Public policy: independent sector works with nonprofits, philanthropies, corporate-giving programs, and lawmakers to shape and advocate for policy solutions and legislation that advance the common good, encourage organizations to become better advocates, and create healthy, equitable communities where everyone thrives.independent sector president and ceo dr. Akilah watkins shared our 2025 tax policy agenda with house and senate budget leaders, urging lawmakers to strengthen the nonprofit sector's financial resources, workforce, civic engagement, and public trust. Throughout the reconciliation process, independent sector tracked provisions affecting nonprofits and partnered with council on foundations, national council of nonprofits, and united philanthropy forum to raise concerns about harmful proposals in the house bill. Together, the organizations led a sign-on letter from more than 2,000 nonprofits in all 50 states urging congress to remove provisions that would harm nonprofits and philanthropy.independent sector also commissioned research on two proposed limits to charitable giving incentives a 35% cap on itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers and a 1% floor on corporate charitable deductions. The analysis found both policies would reduce charitable giving far more than they would generate in federal revenue. While independent sector opposed the final legislation, advocacy efforts helped prevent several damaging provisions from becoming law, including an increase to the private foundation excise tax, the return of the "parking lot tax, and language allowing the treasury department to revoke nonprofit tax-exempt status without adequate transparency or due process.nonprofits contribute significantly to the economy and pay an estimated $75 billion annually in federal payroll taxes, yet they are excluded from many employer tax incentives available to for-profit businesses. In july 2025, independent sector worked with bipartisan congressional leaders to introduce the small nonprofit retirement security act, which would extend retirement-plan tax credits to small nonprofit employers. "nonprofit workers should not have to choose between serving a mission-oriented organization and securing their own retirement," dr. Watkins said. "your legislation would strengthen the nonprofit workforce now and in the years to come."independent sector continued to equip nonprofits with tools, research, and data to strengthen advocacy and organizational effectiveness. In 2025, we expanded our policy trackers covering federal legislation, litigation, and executive actions; supported collaboration through the nonprofit coalition connection; and enhanced our nonprofit state profiles with new data on government grants and workforce financial insecurity. The profiles provide state-by-state data from the IRS, bureau of labor statistics, census bureau, americorps, and independent sector research to help organizations demonstrate the nonprofit sector's impact on communities and the u.s. Economy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.5%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 80%; rating input score 80; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.01; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 27.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.5% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $8.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $769K · 25 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.