Independence Historical Trust

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237179598
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2158614971
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,877,231
Expenses
$1,831,490
Assets
$8,369,201
Liabilities
$415,355

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

People named in this filing

  • THOMAS CARAMANICO (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • WILLIAM MARRAZZO (CHAIRMAN)
  • LEE JAMES WOOLLEY (VICE CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To raise funds to fulfill the mission of independence national historical park and promote its historical, scientific, educational and interpretive activities.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, the organization increased its community engagement activities while supporting major initiatives in independence national historical park and the surrounding gateway community. During that year, the trust accomplished the following programmatic activities: 1) fundraising: this year, the trust completed the design phase and broke ground for the pedestrian plaza that is part of the redesign for the market street road diet. This project will increase mobility, provide bike- friendly lanes, and create a plaza that honors the lenape leader chief tamanend. The organization held a ribbon-cutting for the completed benjamin rush garden, which is the new home for the bicentennial bell. The garden is a welcome green space in the city that locals and visitors alike take advantage of. Also this year, the organization, with the support of generous donors, supported the restoration of a historic guardhouse in Washington square, which won a conservation award from the preservation alliance of greater philadelphia. Through financial support from the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the organization was able to repair over 30 leather reproduction chairs in congress hall and purchase and install a handicap accessible ramp on the south side of independence square. 2) community outreach: with the continued goal to increase awareness of the national park and the organization, community programs reached over 6,000 and were offered to all age groups, and even some dogs. In 2024, the organization hosted yoga in the park, movies on the mall, and bark ranger programs. The programs help all people, all ages, and even some dogs, connected with the national park on multiple levels. 3) volunteering: supporting the national park service's mission to engage people, the trust worked with the park and partners to host volunteer days at the national park. Volunteers cleaned, weeded, mulched, and planted across the park to help beautify the national park before the busy summer season. A total of xx volunteers joined the organization. 4) twilight tours: the trust offered free, evening walking tours on the history of the national park. Over 2,550 attendants from 45 different states and 55 foreign countries attended the program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 29.4%; rating input score 29
  • Program expense ratio: 58.9%; rating input score 59
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52.8%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.57; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 29.4% of revenue deployed · 58.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.