Inclusive Development International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
822413310
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Asheville, NC, USA
Phone
8285054340
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Human Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,093,954
Expenses
$2,919,970
Assets
$5,936,779
Liabilities
$3,707,830

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • David Pred (President & Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • David Pred (President & Executive Director): $150,730 total reported compensation
  • Natalie Bugalski (Senior Legal & Policy Director): $139,888 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Inclusive Development International supports communities around the world to defend their rights and resources in the face of harmful corporate activities and internationally financed development projects, and we advocate for a more just and equitable global economy. We are working toward a world in ecological balance, in which communities and individuals determine their own development paths, and businesses respect their human rights and environmental responsibilities.

What it reported doing in 2024

CASE WORK AND CAPACITY BUILDING: At the request of community advocates worldwide, we investigate corporations, investors, and supply chain actors linked to harmful activities and identify where pressure can drive change. We also train and equip civil society organizations with tools and digital resources to conduct their own investigations and advocacy. In select cases, we go further, partnering with community organizations to design and implement sustained, multi-pronged advocacy strategies aimed at preventing harm and securing redress. . CASE WORK AND CAPACITY BUILDING: In 2024 our researchers opened new avenues for communities to defend their rights by investigating the investment and supply chains of 50 harmful projects in nine countries, along with regional projects in Asia and Africa and one global investigation of the palm oil sector. Participants in our training courses investigated an additional 36 projects in 11 countries with our help. Altogether this research uncovered 151 new advocacy opportunities for communities in 18 countries, which we and our partners helped communities seize in 25 cases. This year we secured 24 important case wins and remedial or preventative outcomes in four cases. . Key case accomplishments in 2024: . -----IDIs casework in Guinea delivered a resounding victory for the Area One community forcibly displaced for an open-pit goldmine. We helped the community negotiate a final settlement agreement with AngloGold Ashanti, including a payment to the affected families for individual compensation owed as a result of the resettlement process and the establishment of a Fund to finance community-led development projects aimed at improving the livelihoods and living standards of the Area One community. The company also delivered infrastructure improvements at the resettlement site and agreed to obtain community consent for any future resettlement in Guinea. In another important policy advance, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) agreed to contribute to this remedial action by providing technical support for the community-led livelihood projects. . -----Other communities we accompanied in Guinea and Liberia reached interim agreements with mining companies, improving access to clean water and health care, and securing recognition of customary land rights and compensation for individual and communal land. . -----With our support, communities affected by the Dairi Prima Mineral zinc mine and tailings dam in earthquake prone North Sumatra successfully challenged the mines environmental permit in Indonesias Supreme Court. The Court directed Indonesias Environment Ministry to revoke approval of the project, concluding that it failed to adequately consult affected people and consider safety risks. . -----We helped negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding between 12 indigenous communities in Northeastern Cambodia and Vietnamese agribusiness company HAGL Agrico to bring about a final resolution of a 15-year old land conflict resulting from the companys plantation development activities. . -----IFCs internal watchdog announced a full compliance investigation into the institutions financial links to two massive coal-fired power plants in Java, Indonesia, that were the subject of a complaint we lodged with community members in 2023. . -----Our advocacy with survivors of child sexual abuse at IFC-financed for-profit schools on Kenya led IFC to consult with them on a remediation plan. Meanwhile, the World Bank board heeded our call to launch an external probe of IFCs interference in the Compliance Advisor Ombudsmans independent investigation of the abuse. . -----The Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil ruled that a Samsung palm oil subsidiary violated Indigenous rights in Sumatra, in response to a complaint that was filed as a result of our supply chain research. . Additionally, we delivered our full 6-month Follow the Money (FTM) training to 45 corporate accountability advocates in Asia and Latin America. We a

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.4%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $28.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.6%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.03; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.4% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $151K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.