Incarnation and Proception Charitable Trust

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
347214737
IRS 990-PF coverage
2018–2018
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2018
Location
Dayton, OH, USA
Rating
29
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$26,286
Expenses
$20,438

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Christianity

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from contributions.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no charitable disbursements for the current year.
  • Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.

The verdict

REVIEW - The endowment provides a meaningful financial cushion. The filing does not identify all grant recipients and a relatively small share of spending goes to grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
  • Cost Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency: 0
  • Compliance: 50
  • Endowment Health: 88

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: Limited

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 48.9%; rating input score 49; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Scored; rating input score 0

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: Limited
  • Filing consistency checks: 8; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 29.26; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Investments: 88th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Transparency: Grant recipient disclosure scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.