In2action

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452934399
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Columbia, MO, USA
Phone
5738184432
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,805,712
Expenses
$2,001,399
Assets
$2,863,066
Liabilities
$620,038

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DORN SCHUFFMAN (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DANIEL HANNEKEN (EXECUTIVE DI): $82,068 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide transition and recovery support services to people recently released from prison and those at risk of incarceration.

What it reported doing in 2024

Coalition program - the central Missouri recovery coalition (cmrc) is an affiliate of the Missouri coalition of recovery support providers and is made up of various governmental and non-governmental service providers, social service agencies, concerned citizens, and other stakeholders to create a cohesive system of care to promote the prevention, treatment, and recovery of substance use disorders in central Missouri. In2action's executive director is the founder and chair of the cmrc. Nap (neighborhood assistance program) - project was to enhance in2action's live skill classes with more professional development curriculum respite program - respite is a four-bed facilty where a person who has relapsed can come and stay for a few days to get the drugs out of their system. The respite house opened in august 2023 and it is staffed 24/7. Arep (adult reentry) program - this project is funded through the substance abuse and mental health services administration (samhsa). Similar to the reentry program, the purpose of this project is to expand substance use disorder (sud) treatment and related recover and reentry services to sentenced adults in the criminal justice system with a sud and/or co- occurring substance use and mental disorders, who are returning to their families and community following a period of incarceration in state and local facilities including prisons, jails, or detention centers. Tcep (treatment capacity) program - this project is funded through the substance abuse and mental health services administration (samhsa). The purpose of this program is to expand substance use disorder (sud) treatment and recovery support services in existing drug courts. The program recognizes the need for treatment instead of incarceration for individuals with suds. This program provides a continuum of care, including prevention, harm reduction, treatment, and recovery services, for individuals with sud involved with the courts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 70% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.7%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $267.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.7%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.7% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $82K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.