In The Streets Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852849176
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2022460079
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Delinquency Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $172,685
- Expenses
- $276,524
- Assets
- $92,136
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sofia Rosenblum (Board Vice president)
- Sharon Lambert (Board President)
People named in this filing
- Grace Fisher (Secretary)
- Raegan Bishop (Treasurer)
- Sofia Rosenblum (Board Vice president)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
ITS is dedicated to interrupting generational trauma by offering high quality yoga classes, therapeutic mentorship, case management, support groups & advocacy via a mixed income model of care that encourages the sharing of social capital.
What it reported doing in 2025
ITS is dedicated to interrupting generational trauma by offering high quality yoga classes, therapeutic mentorship, case management, support groups & advocacy via a mixed income model of care that encourages the sharing of social capital. In The Streets (ITS) is dedicated to interrupting generational trauma by offering high quality yoga classes, therapeutic mentorship, case management, support groups & advocacy via a mixed income model of care that encourages the sharing of social capital. ITS held Yoga classes five times per week over the course of the year including strength, flexibility, and yin yog. ITS also held English breathwork classes weekly and Spanish beginners yoga classes once weekly. ITS provided individual weekly therapeutic mentorship with a licensed psychologist to six individuals and sessions as needed to 40 paticipants. Support groups previously run by licensed clinical social workers and psychologists were paused due to lack of grants and will resume once funding is found for them. Educational Talks (Podcast, Talks to university service-learning students, talks to individuals who requested support in generational trauma work, individual talks about physical health to participants).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83.6%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -60.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $231K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.