In-sight Collaborative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832090182
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Bainbridge Island, WA, USA
Phone
2063038352
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Humanities Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$97,674
Expenses
$42,664
Assets
$88,825

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MADISON WILLIAMSON (CEO)
  • PRIYANKA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MADISON WILLIAMSON (CEO)
  • JUANJO LADINES (CFO)
  • PRIYANKA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Amplify the voices of those unheard and stir up a call to action by providing useful information and resources for those wanting to educate themselves and/or get involved in the global complex humanitarian crises arrising from a variety of causes. Through our network, we aim to find and support new and innovative ideas for ameliorating humanitarian aid and actions on the ground, providing a platform and resources for those who have solutions but otherwise may not have the means to implement them.

What it reported doing in 2025

Create a global network of advocates that seeks to bring to light some of the largest and most difficult humanitarian crises in the world and highlights and foster innovative solutions to those crises. Share stories from voices on the ground and help advocate for a better understanding of these crises and the people involved in them.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.5%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 3

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 56.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.08; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -36.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 31.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.5% of revenue deployed · 3.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.