In Mulieribus

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261396841
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5032832913
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Singing, Choral

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$132,874
Expenses
$139,448
Assets
$100,620
Liabilities
$26,277

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Linda Besant (President)

People named in this filing

  • Mark Kemball (Board Member)
  • Paula Creamer (Treasurer)
  • Kathleen Worley (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

In Mulieribus is a women's vocal ensemble dedicated to strengthening community through the art of music. The ensemble specializes in works written before 1750 and champions new repertoire by women composers and for women's voices. In Mulieribus actively develops collaborations with musical, performing, educational and community organizations in order to expand outreach throughout the region.

What it reported doing in 2024

In Mulieribus hosted a free arts event celebrating underrepresented musical, visual, and physical artists. The event included reception time and opportunities to meet and confer with the variety of participating artists. In Mulieribus also performed at the event. It was the first time such an event was attempted. It was well-received and had attendance of 150-200.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 50.6%; rating input score 51

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.9%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54% of revenue deployed · 50.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $71K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.