In Loving Swineness

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832047529
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Pensacola, FL, USA
Phone
8506023751
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,646
Expenses
$30,708
Assets
$15,025
Liabilities
$6,859

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Christal Ellard (President)
  • Francis Ellard (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Christal Ellard (President)
  • Francis Ellard (Vice President)
  • Julie Carrier (Treasure)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To remove feral hogs from wild places, test pigs for disease and spay, neuter and tag. We then are utilizing the pigs to remove invasive plants that have rendered agriculture land across the Deep South useless. We also educate the public on proper pig care, containment, and pervasive zoonotic disease common in wild pigs and how to prevent disease spread

What it reported doing in 2019

Held two education outreach programs at k-12 schools Held 1 event at local farmers co-op to educate livestock holders on BEST practices for pigs Held 1 online event farmers and hunters dealing with wild pigs invading their property on how to prevent zoonotic disease and BEST practice to prevent future land damage. Cost includes adverts, storage for outreach supplies, and printed handouts

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 74.3%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -163.7%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 74.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $23K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.