In Defense of Animals

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680008936
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
Location
San Rafael, CA, USA
Phone
4154480048
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,883,891
Expenses
$3,193,107
Assets
$9,221,895
Liabilities
$416,832

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARILYN KROPLICK MD (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARILYN KROPLICK MD (PRESIDENT & CEO): $168,132 total reported compensation
  • LISA LEVINSON (SECRETARY): $81,598 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

In addition to the narrative in part 1, line 1, ida's efforts include educational events, cruelty investigations, boycotts, grassroots activism, and hands-on rescue through our sanctuaries in California and Mississippi.

What it reported doing in 2024

In summary, in defense of animals protects the rights, habitats and welfare of animals through a combination of education, lobbying, boycotting and direct action campaigning. Continuation of discussion from form 990, page 2, part 4aida works tirelessly on these projects:* anti-vivisection: end animal experimentation; seek alternatives; educate the general public about unnecessary animal experiments.* fur: educate the public about the cruelty of the fur industry, here in the united states and in korea and china. Ida is an organizer for annual fur free friday international day of protest against the fur trade. Ida holds rallies in san francisco and los angeles every year.* investigations: ida works with law enforcement on cruelty cases to bring justice to companion animals and to farm animals in rural Mississippi. Ida investigates conditions of elephants in zoos across the states, and is committed to ending the suffering for elephants in zoos and circuses. Ida strives to relocate elephants to sanctuaries whenever possible.* sanctuary: ida provides sanctions for rescued and abused animals and give lifetime care when needed, in the united states and abroad. We support ida hope animal sanctuary in grenada ms and we support animal protection in india. Additionally, ida provides veterinary care for the street dogs of mumbai.* programs: ida defends and protects dolphins and whales instead of exploiting them. Ida is working to close existing captive display facilities. Ida is mobilizing supporters to stop mass killing of wild horses. Ida is demanding that federal agencies carry out their duty to protect and preserve wild equines with humane, cost effective science-based solutions. Ida works to protect farmed animals by lobbying for legal change, pressuring major food supply chains to make plant based meals widely available, and public awareness initiatives to inspire cruelty-free lifestyle choices. Ida supports humane and effective community cats management programs that undertake life-saving tnr, trap-neuter-return, and strives to protect community catsand their outdoor homes. Over the years, ida has won some precedent setting victories for our animal friends, both here at home, and around the world. They include:* closing down what once was the largest experimental center for chimpanzees in the world, the hideous coulston foundation. In doing so, hundreds of chimpanzees were freed from the horrors of vivisection.* creating a chimpanzee sanctuary and education center in the west african republic of cameroon, providing a safe haven for severely abused adult chimpanzees and for babies orphaned by a thriving bushmeat trade.* providing ongoing and vigorous support against the dog meat trade in asia* closing down New York university's gruesome crack cocaine experiments on monkeys ... And rockefeller university's horrific vomiting experiments on cats.* saving the lives of 180 "research" beagles at the university of California after an employee tipped us off they were about to be killed.* helping pass a law that, for the first time, protects korea's 1.7 million stray dogs from cruelty, abandonment, and exploitation.* canceling a proposed slaughter of thousands of baby seals off the coast of south africa.* rescuing hundreds of dogs and cats after a devastating firestorm swept through the oakland/berkeley hills, destroying more than 3,500 homes.* liberating 40 dolphins when an ida investigator flew to japan and swam underwater in the dead of night to cut the nets that imprisoned the terrified animals.* filing five lawsuits that resulted in the freeing of 42 racing greyhounds from army, university of California and Arizona research laboratories. Many were already in the midst of painful research. The lawsuits successfully prevented horrific bone breaking experiments on 120 retired racing greyhounds.* conducting undercover investigations that exposed the cruelties of the puppy mill industry ... Rescuing thousands of starving and abused animals,

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 56
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 70.4%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.7%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.89; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 70.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $168K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 35 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.